You have several AI ideas
Leadership needs a defensible way to choose which opportunity deserves a first release.
For SaaS founders and product leaders facing a promising AI opportunity without a shared product direction.
You do not need a finished specification. You do need a real business context, access to the people who understand it, and willingness to choose.
Leadership needs a defensible way to choose which opportunity deserves a first release.
The team needs sharper users, value, boundaries, and behavior before committing development.
A prototype will create a better conversation than another abstract requirements document.
The work stands alone whether I support the next phase or your team takes it forward.
Three working sessions anchor the week. The analysis and prototype develop between them.
Kickoff, material review, users, constraints, and success.
Use-case comparison and opportunity recommendation.
Core journey, product behavior, boundaries, and risks.
Clickable key flow and a focused client review.
Final decision package, evaluation plan, and roadmap.
The prototype is a decision and validation artifact. It is not deployed application code.
The work covers the core journey—not every screen, state, or polished brand component.
One opportunity, one recommended direction, and one consolidated revision round.
The sprint is useful on its own. When the right next move is hands-on support, I can continue in separately scoped four-week Delivery Partner blocks—refining the product, coordinating decisions, and raising the quality of the first release.
“Best communicator I have experienced. He went above and beyond so I actually paid him extra.”
One accountable decision-maker and access to the people or material that best explain the customer and business context. A small working group is better than a large committee.
Yes. Once the final invoice is paid, the client receives the agreed sprint artifacts for internal and commercial use. Contract terms confirm the details before kickoff.
Existing research can be reviewed. Recruiting and running a new research program is outside five-day scope, but the sprint can define the next validation study.
Yes. The sprint is designed for remote collaboration with teams worldwide. Working sessions are scheduled with timezone overlap agreed before booking.
That is a valid outcome. The point is to make a sound product decision, not to force AI into a problem where a simpler solution is better.
I review the context personally. You can then book a short fit call to confirm the decision, scope, timing, and whether the sprint is the right next move.
A short inquiry is enough to begin. You do not need to arrive with a finished brief.