You know who the product is for.
The user, problem, intended outcome, and core journey are clear enough to make implementation tradeoffs.
Gabriel-led product design and development for responsive web, PWA, or Expo-based native applications when you need one accountable owner across product and delivery.
AI-first, not AI-required · Custom scope · Phased delivery
This engagement starts after the central product decision has become explicit. That can come from the five-day sprint or from product evidence and specifications your team already trusts.
The user, problem, intended outcome, and core journey are clear enough to make implementation tradeoffs.
A founder or product leader is available to resolve priorities, supply business context, and approve release decisions.
The work can be phased around one coherent release, with later capabilities kept outside the initial commitment.
Direction still unclear? Start with the five-day AI Product Direction Sprint before commissioning a build.
The exact work is agreed after a technical and product review. A build covers the connected responsibilities required by the accepted release—not a preset technology bundle.
Confirm the release boundary, architecture needs, dependencies, risks, environments, and acceptance evidence before implementation expands.
Refine interaction, responsive behavior, system states, AI behavior where relevant, user control, and the reusable interface needed by the release.
Develop the agreed web, PWA, or Expo-native experience and connect required data, AI, authentication, subscriptions, and operational services.
Test intended journeys and adjacent failures, resolve launch-critical issues, support agreed web or app-store release steps, and document the product.
A working version of the specifically agreed release—not an unlimited roadmap, every future feature, guaranteed store approval, or guaranteed market adoption.
The engagement is AI-first but not AI-dependent. Platform and system choices follow the user journey, release conditions, and operating constraints.
A browser-based SaaS product designed across desktop and mobile layouts, with the states and accessibility required by the agreed journey.
A responsive product with installability and supported device capabilities when a progressive web application fits the distribution need.
A shared cross-platform implementation for iOS and Android, with native behavior and store-submission support scoped to the release.
Backend, data, AI, identity, subscriptions, administration, analytics, and third-party services included only where the product requires them.
Distribution boundary: I can prepare and support an agreed App Store or Google Play submission. Apple and Google control review and approval.
With Vivid Resume, I carried a broad AI idea through product definition, experience design, implementation direction, integrations, quality review, and a shipped closed-beta release. It demonstrates end-to-end ownership; it does not yet establish customer or business outcomes.
A complete SaaS build cannot be responsibly sold as a universal package. The fit call and a paid direction phase establish what can be promised before a build proposal is agreed.
Work is divided into explicit stages with review points. A later phase is not assumed before the current evidence supports it.
Timeline, fee, responsibilities, platforms, integrations, and acceptance conditions depend on the agreed release.
Third-party costs, client-provided accounts and content, ongoing operations, and post-launch support are identified before work begins.
The engagement should leave usable code, documentation, access, and product context—not dependency on an indefinite retainer.
Bring the opportunity, what is already decided, and the release you believe needs to exist. We’ll use a 30-minute call to determine whether the next step is the fixed sprint, a build assessment, or no engagement.